Skip to main content
Download PDF

Comparative study of liver injury induced by high-fat methionine- and choline-deficient diet in ICR mice originating from three different sources

Laboratory Animal Research volume 35, Article number: 15 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the leading cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. It is characterized by the accumulation of lipids without alcohol intake and often progresses to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), liver fibrosis, and end-stage liver diseases such as cirrhosis or cancer. Although animal models have greatly contributed to the understanding of NAFLD, studies on the disease progression in humans are still limited. In this study, we used the recently reported high-fat L-methionine-defined and choline-deficient (HFMCD) diet to rapidly induce NASH and compared the responses to HFMCD in ICR mice from three different countries: Korea (supplied by the National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation), USA, and Japan during 6 weeks. Feeding HFMCD did not cause significant differences in weight gain in comparison with mice fed control diet. Relative weight of the liver increased gradually, while the relative weight of the kidneys remained unchanged. The parameters of liver injury (serum activities of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and lactate dehydrogenase) increased rapidly from 1 week and remained elevated for as long as 6 weeks. Histopathological analysis showed that the accumulation of hepatic lipids induced by HFMCD was prominent at 1 week after diet supplementation and increased further at 6 weeks. Inflammatory markers were significantly increased in a time-dependent manner by HFMCD. The mRNA levels of TNF-α and IL-6 were elevated approximately 15-fold relative to control diet and that of IL-1β was increased more than 20-folds at 6 week after the onset of HFMCD intake. In addition, mRNA expression of fibrosis markers such as α-SMA, TGFβ1, and Col1a1 were also significantly increased at 6 week. In summary, the responses of Korl:ICR mice by intake of HFMCD diet were similar to those of ICR mice from other sources, which suggests that Korl:ICR mice is also a useful resource to study the pathogenesis of diet-induced NAFLD.

Introduction

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a liver metabolic disorder that does not involve alcohol intake. Importantly, over the years obesity rates have increased due to changes in lifestyle and food habits, and as a result NAFLD has become a common cause of chronic liver disease in many countries [1]. NAFLD includes a wide spectrum of liver diseases from simple steatosis to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), fibrosis and cirrhosis, and ultimately hepatocellular carcinoma and liver failure [2]. Simple steatosis is usually not considered a serious condition. However, NASH can develop into cirrhosis or liver cancer, which may eventually be fatal [3]. Although many studies have been carried out, the pathological mechanisms of NAFLD remain to be elucidated and therapeutic drugs remain to be developed. The wide spectrum of NAFLDs makes it difficult to identify precise stage of disease, and the characteristics of very slowly progressive diseases are difficult to determine in clinical research [4]. Therefore, an animal model recapitulating human NAFLD can provide important information to determine the pathogenesis of the disease and to investigate the therapeutic effects of various drugs [5].

Animal models of NAFLD are largely classified as genetically engineered and nutritional (dietary) models according to etiology. In general, dietary induction of NAFLD in experimental animals is the preferred method to reproduce conditions observed in humans such as metabolic syndrome, whereas genetically engineered animals are used for detailed mechanistic studies [6]. Because the ICR mice have a low level of aggression and strong breeding ability, they are used worldwide for research on many diseases in diverse fields such as oncology, infections, and pharmacology [7].

The most widely used diet to induce NAFLD is the methionine- and choline-deficient (MCD) diet. It provides a very reproducible and efficient model to induce a severe NASH phenotype in a short period of administration such as 8 weeks [8]. Specifically, choline deficiency inhibits the synthesis of phosphatidylcholine, which is required for very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) production, and is followed by lipid accumulation in the liver [9, 10]. The deficiency of the essential amino acid methionine decreases the biosynthesis of glutathione (GSH), the most potent antioxidant in the body, and leads to oxidative stress, which in turn contributes to liver damage [11]. However, MCD diet can cause serious weight loss, which is not usually observed in patients with NAFLD [12, 13]. Another well-studied dietary model is high-fat diet–induced NAFLD accompanied by obesity, although the diverse composition of such diets makes it difficult to compare studies from different research groups. Standard high-fat diets generally result in hepatic steatosis and do not induce significant NASH symptoms such as cell death, inflammation, or fibrosis even after feeding for more than 28 weeks [14]. A recent study introduced an improved mouse model to overcome the limitations of both MCD and high-fat diet [6]. The authors developed high-fat L-methionine- and choline-deficient (HFMCD) diet, composed of 60 kcal% fat, no added choline, and 0.1% methionine, by combining MCD with high-fat diet. This diet rapidly induced inflammatory response and fibrosis as well as steatosis in C57BL/6 J mice within 6 weeks without weight loss [6].

The Korl:ICR mice, which is the resident stock of the National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation (NIFDS), have been used for decades in terms of conducting Lot release project and more, in the NIFDS. According to the Nagoya Protocol, which describes a fair and equitable distribution of benefits arising from the use of genetic resources, securing national sovereignty over their resources is an important global issue. NIFDS identified biological characteristics of Korl:ICR compared with other ICR stocks to secure the indigenous data in 2017 [15]. Although there were no significant differences among the biological phenotypes of Korl:ICR and other ICR mice, phylogenetic analysis showed that the population stratification of the Korl:ICR was allocated different area from that of other ICR mice, suggesting that the Korl:ICR source colony could be a new stock in distinction from other ICR mice. In line with this, this study aimed to provide experimental results for securing Korl:ICR mice as Korea resource. Especially, we compared the response to the HFMCD diet of ICR mice from three different sources (NIFDS in Korea and suppliers in the USA and Japan) and evaluated the usefulness of the Korl:ICR mice in the research of pathogenesis of NAFLD and preclinical testing for drug development.

Materials and methods

Animals and treatment

Eight-week-old male ICR mice were obtained from three different sources. Korl:ICR mice were kindly provided by the Department of Laboratory and Animal Resources at the NIFDS (Cheongju, Korea). The other two groups of ICR mice were purchased from suppliers in the United States (A:ICR) and Japan (B:ICR). All animal experiments were approved by the Pusan National University Animal Experimentation and Use Committee (PNU-2018-1994). The basic conditions such as facility environment and diet were as described previously [16]. The mice were acclimated to 22 ± 2 °C and humidity of 55 ± 5% in the diet room with a 12-h light/dark cycle for 1 week prior to use. They were randomly divided into two groups fed different diets for 6 weeks: normal diet (control) or HFMCD composed of 60 kcal% fat, no added choline, and 0.1% methionine. The liver and kidneys were sampled at 1 and 6 weeks.

Blood biochemical analysis

Blood samples were obtained from the abdominal aorta of each mouse; the sera were separated using a BD Microtainer Blood Collection Tube (BD Life Sciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and used to measure activities of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). ALT and AST were measured using the protocols of Reitman and Frankel [17], and LDH was measured using a commercial kit purchased from Dogen (Seoul, Korea). The results were quantified with a spectrophotometer using a Multiskan GO reader (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

Histopathological analysis

The left lateral lobe of the liver was sliced and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. Tissues were embedded in paraffin, and a 5-μm section was stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) to discriminate the nuclei and cytoplasm.

RNA purification and quantitative RT-PCR

Quantitative RT-PCR was determined as reported previously [16]. Total RNA was isolated from the liver lysate using the Direct-zol RNA kit (Zymo Research, Orange, CA, USA). cDNA was synthesized with a iScript cDNA Synthesis system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using the SensiFAST SYBR qPCR mix (Bioline, London, UK) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The values of gene expression were normalized to those of GAPDH. Primer sequences are provided in Table 1.

Table 1 Primers used for quantitative RT-PCR
Full size table

Statistical analysis

All data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance was determined using Student’s t-test, and p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Effects of HFMCD diet on body weight change

High-fat diets cause obesity and insulin resistance, but 30 weeks are needed to establish NASH [14]. The MCD diet is often used to induce NASH by inducing hepatic steatosis and inflammation within 4 weeks, but it is characterized by severe weight loss [13]. Therefore, we attempted to induce NAFLD/NASH by using HFMCD diet. Body weight changes during 6 weeks showed no significant differences between control and HFMCD-fed mice (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effect of HFMCD on changes in body weight of Korl:ICR (a), A:ICR (b), and B:ICR (c) mice. ICR mice were fed control (CON) or high-fat L-methionine- and choline-deficient (HFMCD) diet composed of 60 kcal% fat, no added choline, and 0.1% methionine for 6 weeks. n = 8 per diet

Full size image

Effects of HFMCD diet on changes in relative weights of liver and kidney

To examine the effect of feeding duration, we obtained samples at 1 and 6 weeks after HFMCD supplementation. The relative weight of the liver increased gradually (Fig. 2a) and at 6 weeks showed an approximately 2-fold increase in HFMCD-fed mice in comparison with control diet–fed mice. The relative weight of the kidneys remained unchanged during the experiment (Fig. 2b). The results were similar in all mice regardless of their origin.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effect of HFMCD diet for 1 and 6 weeks on the relative weights of the liver (a) and kidney (b) of mice from three different sources. *** Significantly different from the corresponding control mice (Student’s t-test, P < 0.001)

Full size image

Effect of HFMCD diet on ALT, AST and LDH activities in serum

Serum activities of ALT (Fig. 3a), AST (Fig. 3b), and LDH (Fig. 3c), which are indicators of liver injury, were significantly increased by HFMCD diet at 1 week and remained elevated at 6 weeks.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effect of HFMCD diet for 1 and 6 weeks on the activities of (a) alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and (b) aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and (c) lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in the serum of mice from three different sources. *** Significantly different from the corresponding control mice (Student’s t-test, P < 0.001)

Full size image

Effects of HFMCD diet on histopathological changes in the liver

We examined histopathological changes in the liver to find whether HFMCD induced the progression of NAFLD in a time-dependent manner. At 1 week, NAFLD induced both micro- and macro-vesicles, reflecting lipid accumulation in the liver; this effect was more severe at 6 weeks (Fig. 4). Macrovesicles occupied most of the liver, and neutrophil infiltration, which is an inflammatory reaction, was also observed in the liver of HFMCD-fed mice at 6 weeks. These results suggest that HFMCD induces progression from steatosis to NASH in a time-dependent manner within 6 weeks. Significance of the differences among mice of different origins was not examined.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effect of HFMCD diet for 1 and 6 weeks on lipid accumulation in the liver of mice from three different sources. Liver tissues were stained with H&E

Full size image

Induction of inflammatory response in the liver by HFMCD diet

MCD diet increases the secretion of inflammatory cytokines and thereby induces liver inflammation, leading to NASH [18]. To confirm the induction of an inflammatory response by HFMCD suggested by neutrophil infiltration, we examined mRNA expression of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β in the liver. All three cytokines showed time-dependent increases and were dramatically induced by HFMCD at 6 weeks after (Fig. 5). The levels of TNF-α (Fig. 5a) and IL-6 (Fig. 5b) transcripts were elevated approximately 15-fold and that of IL-1β (Fig. 5c) was increased more than 20-fold at 6 weeks after the intake of HFMCD.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effects of the HFMCD diet for 1 and 6 weeks on the mRNA levels of three inflammatory markers in mice from three different sources. *** Significantly different from the corresponding control mice (Student’s t-test, P < 0.001)

Full size image

Expression of fibrosis markers in the liver by HFMCD diet

Fibrosis is considered a more advanced stage of NAFLD and we wondered whether intake of HFMCD for 6 weeks would affect liver fibrogenesis in ICR mice. The mRNA level of α-SMA and TGFβ1, markers for the activation of hepatic stellate cells, and collagen 1A1(Col1a1), one of ECM components, were significantly induced by HFMCD at 6 weeks after (Fig. 6). The transcript levels of α-SMA (Fig. 6a), TGFβ1 (Fig. 6b), and Col1a1 (Fig. 6c) were elevated approximately 8-, 15-, and 3-fold, respectively at 6 weeks after the intake of HFMCD.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Effects of the HFMCD diet for 6 weeks on the mRNA expression level of the fibrosis markers of mice from three different sources. *, **, *** Significantly different from the corresponding control mice (Student's t-test, P < 0.05, 0.01, 0.001, respectively)

Full size image

Discussion

NAFLD has become the most common cause of chronic liver disease worldwide as the incidences of obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome have increased [19]. NAFLD includes a clinico-pathological spectrum of fatty liver diseases that occur in the absence of alcohol consumption [20]. The initial symptom is hepatic steatosis, which is considered to be a relatively benign liver injury. However, if the liver damage worsen, progression to NASH becomes faster and the mortality rate related to liver disease increases [21]. NASH is characterized by the presence of steatosis, inflammation, and hepatocellular death [22]. There is increasing evidence that NASH can cause progressive fibrosis, cirrhosis, and subsequently liver cancer [23].

The MCD diet has long been used to study NAFLD. MCD diet–fed animals show considerable lipid accumulation in the liver from 2 to 4 weeks, followed by inflammation and progression of fibrosis [24]. MCD diet reduces the VLDL secretion, increases fatty acid intake, induces inflammatory signaling, induces endoplasmic reticulum stress, and triggers lipid peroxidation [25]. It has the advantage of inducing NAFLD in a short period of time, but its disadvantage is a serious weight loss, which is not a common symptom in human NAFLD patients [26]. Therefore, HFMCD diet, which is a combination of high-fat and MCD diet, has been proposed to reproduce the pathological symptoms of NAFLD [6]. Importantly, this diet model mimics human disease, including many of the biochemical and histopathological features of NAFLD progression [27]. To date, some groups have reported differences among inbred mice strains in relation to their susceptibility to diet induced NAFLD and NASH [6, 28,29,30,31]. In particular, HFMCD diet induced more severe NASH phenotype with fibrosis in C57BL/6 mice compared with A/J mice [6], and long-term exposure to a HFD led to NASH in C57BL/6 J mice but not in A/J mice [31].

The ICR mice are outbreds that are non-consanguineous and heterogeneous, which brings them closer to representing natural populations. Currently, they are one of the most widely used experimental animals to study metabolic diseases such as obesity, diabetes, and NAFLD [32, 33]. Originally they were derived from Swiss mice developed at the Rockefeller Institute and are now produced in large quantities by a number of worldwide breeders [34]. The NIFDS in Korea has also established an ICR mouse stock called Korl:ICR and it was used for the last 50 years in the NIFDS [35]. This study aimed to compare the response of ICR mice from three different sources to HFMCD diet supply to ensure the usefulness of Korl:ICR in the research of NAFLD pathogenesis and preclinical drug development. HFMCD did not cause significant differences in body weight gain in comparison with control diet, but increased the relative weight of the liver in a time-dependent manner and dramatically increased the serum parameters of liver injury from 1 week after feeding. The accumulation of hepatic lipids induced by HFMCD was prominent from 1 week and was accompanied by significant inflammatory and fibrogenic responses at 6 week, as evidenced by neutrophil infiltration as well as accumulation of mRNA for pro-inflammatory cytokines and fibrosis markers. No significant differences in these responses were observed among the ICR mice from different sources.

Conclusions

This study implicates that HFMCD model could be another option to overcome the disadvantage of the NAFLD model induced by the MCD or high-fat diet. We also found that the responses of Korl:ICR mice established by the NIFDS in Korea are similar to those of ICR mice from other sources, which suggests that it is a useful resource to study the pathogenesis of diet-induced NAFLD.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

AST:

Aspartate aminotransferase

GSH:

Glutathione

H&E:

Hematoxylin and eosin

HFMCD:

High-fat L-methionine-defined and choline-deficient

LDH:

Lactate dehydrogenase

NAFLD:

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

NASH:

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

NIFDS:

National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation

VLDL:

Very low-density lipoprotein

References

  1. Anstee QM, Targher G, Day CP. Progression of NAFLD to diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease or cirrhosis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10(6):330–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Malaguarnera M, Di Rosa M, Nicoletti F, Malaguarnera L. Molecular mechanisms involved in NAFLD progression. J Mol Med (Berl). 2009;87(7):679–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Michelotti GA, Machado MV, Diehl AM. NAFLD, NASH and liver cancer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10(11):656–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Takahashi Y, Soejima Y, Fukusato T. Animal models of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(19):2300–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nakamura A, Terauchi Y. Lessons from mouse models of high-fat diet-induced NAFLD. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(11):21240–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Matsumoto M, Hada N, Sakamaki Y, Uno A, Shiga T, Tanaka C, et al. An improved mouse model that rapidly develops fibrosis in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Int J Exp Pathol. 2013;94(2):93–103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Eaton GJ, Johnson FN, Custer RP, Crane AR. The ICR:ha (ICR) mouse: a current account of breeding, mutations, diseases and mortality. Lab Anim. 1980;14(1):17–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Itagaki H, Shimizu K, Morikawa S, Ogawa K, Ezaki T. Morphological and functional characterization of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease induced by a methionine-choline-deficient diet in C57BL/6 mice. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2013;6(12):2683–96.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lau JK, Zhang X, Yu J. Animal models of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: current perspectives and recent advances. J Pathol. 2017;241(1):36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Corbin KD, Zeisel SH. Choline metabolism provides novel insights into nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and its progression. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2012;28(2):159–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bin P, Huang R, Zhou X. Oxidation resistance of the sulfur amino acids: methionine and cysteine. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:9584932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Machado MV, Michelotti GA, Xie G, Almeida Pereira T, Boursier J, Bohnic B, et al. Mouse models of diet-induced nonalcoholic steatohepatitis reproduce the heterogeneity of the human disease. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0127991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chiba T, Suzuki S, Sato Y, Itoh T, Umegaki K. Evaluation of methionine content in a high-fat and choline-deficient diet on body weight gain and the development of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in mice. PLoS One. 2016;11(10):e0164191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Clapper JR, Hendricks MD, Gu G, Wittmer C, Dolman CS, Herich J, et al. Diet-induced mouse model of fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis reflecting clinical disease progression and methods of assessment. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2013;305(7):G483–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shin HJ, Cho YM, Shin HJ, Kim HD, Choi KM, Kim MG, et al. Comparison of commonly used ICR stocks and the characterization of Korl:ICR. Lab Anim Res. 2017;33(1):8–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee YH, Kim SH, Lee S, Kim KM, Jung JC, Son TG, et al. Antioxidant Effect of Barley Sprout Extract via Enhancement of Nuclear Factor-Erythroid 2 Related Factor 2 Activity and Glutathione Synthesis. Nutrients. 2017;9(11).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Reitman S, Frankel S. A colorimetric method for the determination of serum glutamic oxalacetic and glutamic pyruvic transaminases. Am J Clin Pathol. 1957;28(1):56–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dela Pena A, Leclercq I, Field J, George J, Jones B, Farrell G. NF-kappaB activation, rather than TNF, mediates hepatic inflammation in a murine dietary model of steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology. 2005;129(5):1663–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Angulo P, Hui JM, Marchesini G, Bugianesi E, George J, Farrell GC, et al. The NAFLD fibrosis score: a noninvasive system that identifies liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. Hepatology. 2007;45(4):846–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ong JP, Younossi ZM. Epidemiology and natural history of NAFLD and NASH. Clin Liver Dis 2007;11(1):1–16, vii.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kanuri G, Bergheim I. In vitro and in vivo models of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(6):11963–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Brunt EM, Kleiner DE, Wilson LA, Belt P, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Network NCR. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) activity score and the histopathologic diagnosis in NAFLD: distinct clinicopathologic meanings. Hepatology. 2011;53(3):810–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Promrat K, Lutchman G, Uwaifo GI, Freedman RJ, Soza A, Heller T, et al. A pilot study of pioglitazone treatment for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2004;39(1):188–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rinella ME, Elias MS, Smolak RR, Fu T, Borensztajn J, Green RM. Mechanisms of hepatic steatosis in mice fed a lipogenic methionine choline-deficient diet. J Lipid Res. 2008;49(5):1068–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jung YA, Choi YK, Jung GS, Seo HY, Kim HS, Jang BK, et al. Sitagliptin attenuates methionine/choline-deficient diet-induced steatohepatitis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;105(1):47–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Larter CZ, Yeh MM, Williams J, Bell-Anderson KS, Farrell GC. MCD-induced steatohepatitis is associated with hepatic adiponectin resistance and adipogenic transformation of hepatocytes. J Hepatol. 2008;49(3):407–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rinella ME, Green RM. The methionine-choline deficient dietary model of steatohepatitis does not exhibit insulin resistance. J Hepatol. 2004;40(1):47–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Burrage LC, Baskin-Hill AE, Sinasac DS, Singer JB, Croniger CM, Kirby A, et al. Genetic resistance to diet-induced obesity in chromosome substitution strains of mice. Mamm Genome. 2010;21(3–4):115–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Maina V, Sutti S, Locatelli I, Vidali M, Mombello C, Bozzola C, et al. Bias in macrophage activation pattern influences non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in mice. Clin Sci (Lond). 2012;122(11):545–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Yamazaki Y, Kakizaki S, Takizawa D, Ichikawa T, Sato K, Takagi H, et al. Interstrain differences in susceptibility to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23(2):276–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hill-Baskin AE, Markiewski MM, Buchner DA, Shao H, DeSantis D, Hsiao G, et al. Diet-induced hepatocellular carcinoma in genetically predisposed mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18(16):2975–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhuhua Z, Zhiquan W, Zhen Y, Yixin N, Weiwei Z, Xiaoyong L, et al. A novel mice model of metabolic syndrome: the high-fat-high-fructose diet-fed ICR mice. Exp Anim. 2015;64(4):435–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gilat T, Leikin-Frenkel A, Goldiner I, Juhel C, Lafont H, Gobbi D, et al. Prevention of diet-induced fatty liver in experimental animals by the oral administration of a fatty acid bile acid conjugate (FABAC). Hepatology. 2003;38(2):436–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Chia R, Achilli F, Festing MF, Fisher EM. The origins and uses of mouse outbred stocks. Nat Genet. 2005;37(11):1181–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kim JE, Yun WB, Sung JE, Lee HA, Choi JY, Choi YS, et al. Characterization the response of Korl:ICR mice to loperamide induced constipation. Lab Anim Res. 2016;32(4):231–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate NIFDS for providing Korl:ICR mice and its information.

Funding

This project was supported by a grant of NLAR (National Laboratory Animal Resources) from Ministry of Food and Drug Safety in 2018.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Seunghyun Lee and Jae-Hwan Kwak contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Pharmacy, Pusan National University, Busan, South Korea

    Seunghyun Lee, Sou Hyun Kim, Tae Bin Jeong, Seung Won Son, Joung-Hee Kim & Young-Suk Jung

  2. College of Pharmacy, Brain Busan 21 Plus Program, Kyungsung University, Busan, South Korea

    Jae-Hwan Kwak

  3. Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, College of Nursing and Healthcare Science, Dong-Eui University, Busan, South Korea

    Yong Lim

  4. Exercise Biochemistry Laboratory, Korea National Sport University, Seoul, South Korea

    Joon-Yong Cho

  5. Department of Biomaterials Science, College of Natural Resources & Life Science/Life and Industry Convergence Research Institute, Pusan National University, Miryang, South Korea

    Dae Youn Hwang

  6. College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea

    Kil Soo Kim

Authors
  1. Seunghyun Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jae-Hwan Kwak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sou Hyun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tae Bin Jeong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Seung Won Son
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Joung-Hee Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yong Lim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Joon-Yong Cho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Dae Youn Hwang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Kil Soo Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Young-Suk Jung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SL, JHK SHK, JYC, DYH, KSK, and YSJ were responsible for the study concept and design. SL, JHK SHK, TBJ, SWS, JHK, and YL contributed to data acquisition. LS, JHK, SHK, and YSJ assisted with data analysis and interpretation of findings. SL, JHK, and YSJ drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young-Suk Jung.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, S., Kwak, JH., Kim, S.H. et al. Comparative study of liver injury induced by high-fat methionine- and choline-deficient diet in ICR mice originating from three different sources. Lab Anim Res 35, 15 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42826-019-0016-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42826-019-0016-y

Keywords

Laboratory Animal Research

ISSN: 2233-7660